When it comes to pet safety, fleas and ticks are a major concern for pet parents. These parasites can cause great harm and discomfort to our pets, and they can even be lethal if left untreated. Therefore, protecting your furry pet from the havoc of these pests is paramount. By using flea and tick treatments, you can ensure your pet is safe and free of these pests.
Frontline and Nexgard are trusted brands for flea and tick treatments for pets. Both of them have been widely used in the prevention and treatment of flea and tick infestations. But which one of these two is the safest option? In this blog, we will answer just that! Keep reading to find out which one is the best and safest option for your furry friend.
Overview: Frontline Plus Vs NexGard
Both Frontline Plus and NexGard are approved to treat and prevent flea and tick infestations in dogs. These treatments effectively target and eliminate fleas and ticks and treat the infestations caused by them.
Frontline Plus is a topical, ectoparasitic flea and tick treatment that is applied directly to the skin of your dog. It is approved for use on puppies and dogs ageing 8 weeks and older and weighing at least 2 kg.
On the other hand, NexGard is an oral beef-flavoured, chewable flea and tick treatment. It acts as an external parasiticide and effectively targets and controls fleas and ticks that infest your dog. NexGard is approved for use in dogs 8 weeks of age and older and weighing at least 2 kg.
Both Frontline Plus and NexGard provide long-lasting protection against fleas and ticks, making them popular choices among pet owners.
Comparing Frontline Plus Vs NexGard
While both Frontline Plus and NexGard offer comprehensive protection against fleas and ticks, both are unique in their own ways.
Frontline Plus is a topical treatment that is applied directly to your dog’s skin, while NexGard is an oral chewable tablet. Some pet parents may find it easier to administer NexGard, especially if their dogs are not fond of topical treatments. On the other hand, some may prefer Frontline Plus if their dogs don’t take chewable or oral treatments.
Furthermore, both treatments feature a different composition. Frontline Plus comprises two active ingredients: fipronil and s-methoprene. Nexgard comprises only one active ingredient, afoxolaner. Due to the difference in their composition, both treatments exhibit different mechanisms of action.
The following comparison table provides a detailed breakdown of the composition and specific activity of both Frontline Plus and Nexgard.
Which Dog Flea and Tick Control is the Best and Safest?
Both Frontline Plus and NexGard are effective in treating and controlling fleas and ticks in dogs. However, both products have significant differences that make one better than the other, depending on your specific needs.
Frontline Plus, being a topical treatment, is easy to administer, and its waterproof nature helps provide up to 1 month of protection against fleas, ticks, and lice. Moreover, its safety has been evaluated in pregnant and lactating dogs and is safe for use.
On the other hand, NexGard is an oral chew. Its beef flavor makes it easily accepted by dogs. It offers comprehensive protection against fleas, ticks, and mites for a month. However, its safety in pregnant and lactating female dogs is not evaluated.
Bottom Line: Which One Should You Choose?
When it comes to choosing between Frontline Plus and NexGard, it ultimately depends on your preferences and the specific needs of your dog. If your dog prefers oral chews, NexGard may be a better option for you. Moreover, if your dog is pregnant, breeding, or lactating, Frontline Plus may be a better choice, as its safety has been established in such dogs.
Ultimately, it’s important to consult with your vet to determine which product is best suited for your dog’s individual needs. They can help you evaluate your dog’s specific health conditions and needs and help you make a more informed decision, ensuring the safety and well-being of your furry companion.
